Sunday, June 20, 2010
75 linee di gambetto nella Scandinava
(trasposizioni incluse)
1.e4 d5 2.b3
1.e4 d5 2.b4
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 c6 3.Cf3 de4 4.Cg5
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 de4 3.Ce4 Dd5 4.Cc3 Da5 5.b4
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 de4 3.d3
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 de4 3.Ac4
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 de4 3.Ac4 Cf6 4.f3
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 de4 3.f3
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 e6 3.d4 Ab4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Aa5 6.b4
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 e5 3.d4 Cc6
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 Cf6 3.d3 de4 4.Ag5
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 Cf6 3.d4
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 Cf6 3.d4 Ce4
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 Cf6 3.ed5 c6
1.e4 d5 2.Cc3 Cf6 3.e5 Cfd7 4.e6
1.e4 d5 2.d3 de4 3.Cc3
1.e4 d5 2.d3 de4 3.Cc3 Cf6 4.Ag5
1.e4 d5 2.d4
1.e4 d5 2.d4 Cc6 3.Cc3 de4 4.d5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 Cc6 3.Cc3 de4 4.d5 Ce5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 Cc6 3.Cc3 e5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 Cc6 3.Ae3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 c6 3.Cc3 de4 4.f3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 c6 3.f3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 c6 3.f3 de4 4.fe4 e5 5.Cf3 ed4 6.Ac4
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 Cc6 4.d5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 Cc6 4.d5 Ce5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 e6 4.f3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 e5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 Cf6 4.Ae3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 Cf6 4.Ag5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 Cf6 4.f3 c6 5.Ac4
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 Cf6 4.f3 e5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.Cc3 Cf6 4.f3 ef3 5.Df3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.d5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 de4 3.f3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e6 3.Cc3 de4 4.f3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e6 3.Cc3 Ab4 4.Ad2
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e6 3.Cc3 Ab4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Aa5 6.b4
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e6 3.Cd2 c5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e6 3.Ae3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e6 3.e5 c5 4.Dg4 cd4 5.Cf3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e6 3.Cf3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 e5
1.e4 d5 2.d4 Cf6 3.Cc3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 Cf6 3.Cc3 de4 4.f3 ef3 5.Df3
1.e4 d5 2.d4 g6 3.Cc3 Ag7
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 c6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 c6 3.Cc3 Cf6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 c6 3.dc6 e5
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Dd5 3.Cc3 Da5 4.b4
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Dd5 3.d4 Cc6 4.Cc3
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 e6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 e5
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 e5 3.f4 Ac5
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.Cc3 c6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.c4 c6 4.Cc3 cd5 5.d4 g6 6.cd5 Ag7
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.c4 c6 4.Cc3 cd5 5.d4 Cc6 6.Ag5 Db6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.c4 c6 4.d4 cd5 5.Cc3 Cc6 6.Ag5 Db6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.c4 c6 4.d4 cd5 5.Cc3 g6 6.cd5 Ag7
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.c4 e6
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.c4 g6 4.d4 b5
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.d4 c6 4.dc6 e5
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.d4 Ag4 4.f3 Af5 5.Ab5 Cbd7
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.d4 Ag4 4.Ab5 Cbd7 5.f3 Bf5
1.e4 d5 2.ed5 Cf6 3.d4 g6 4.c4 b5
1.e4 d5 2.e5 e6 3.d4 c5 4.Dg4 cd4 5.Cf3
1.e4 d5 2.e5 e6 3.Cf3 c5 4.b4
1.e4 d5 2.f3 c6 3.d4
1.e4 d5 2.f3 de4 3.Cc3
1.e4 d5 2.f3 Cf6 3.d4
1.e4 d5 2.f4
1.e4 d5 2.Cf3 c6 3.d4
1.e4 d5 2.Cf3 de4 3.Cg5
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Carlsen - Wang: 1-0 Gambetto di Re
[Event "4th Kings Tournament"]
[Site "Medias ROU"]
[Date "2010.06.17" ]
[Round "4"]
[White "Carlsen, M."]
[Black "Wang Yue"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C36"]
[WhiteElo "2813"]
[BlackElo "2752"]
[PlyCount "107"]
[EventDate "2010.06.14" ]
1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 exf4 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Bc4 Nxd5 6. O-O Be7 7. Bxd5 Qxd5
8. Nc3 Qd8 9. d4 O-O 10. Bxf4 Bf5 11. Qe2 Bd6 [novità] 12. Bxd6 Qxd6 13. Nb5 Qd8 14. c4
a6 15. Nc3 Nd7 16. Rad1 Bg6 17. Qf2 Re8 18. h3 Rc8 19. Rfe1 Rxe1+ 20. Rxe1 c6
21. d5 Nf6 22. Qd4 cxd5 23. Nxd5 Nxd5 24. cxd5 Qd6 25. Ne5 Re8 26. Re3 Rd8 27.
Nc4 Qf6 28. Re5 h6 29. d6 Bf5 30. Nb6 Be6 31. d7 Kh8 32. a4 g6 33. Qc3 Kg7 34.
a5 h5 35. h4 Rxd7 36. Nxd7 Bxd7 37. Qd4 Bc6 38. b4 Bb5 39. Kh2 Ba4 40. Rd5 Bc6
41. Qxf6+ Kxf6 42. Rc5 Ke6 43. Kg3 f6 44. Kf2 Bd5 45. g3 g5 46. g4 hxg4 47. h5
Be4 48. Rc7 f5 49. h6 f4 50. h7 g3+ 51. Ke1 f3 52. h8=Q f2+ 53. Ke2 Bd3+ 54.
Ke3 1-0 [Dopo 54...f1=Q segue il matto in 11 mosse]
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
The Psychology of Gambit Chess Openings
| |
(Click here for a PGN file with the five games contained in this article.)
A gambit chess opening involves the sacrifice of one or more pawns, pieces or even a combination of pawns and pieces in the opening part of the game to obtain compensation in terms of better central control, better development of pieces or some other kind of advantage. Playing a gambit chess opening in a chess game requires a different mindset from playing a regular chess opening where no pawns or pieces are sacrificed early in the opening.
1. FEAR
In a gambit chess opening you will more likely be one or two pawns down after playing the gambit. You could even be a piece down such as in the Halloween Attack (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nxe5). But a lot of players have this fear of being down by one pawn, two pawns or even a piece down in an opening. This fear stems from the endgame where you have this sinking feeling that you will eventually lose the game. As a gambit player you must have faith that your gambit chess opening will win despite being down. You must have faith in your opening preparation.
Fear of your opponent can have a paralyzing effect on you. If you fear your opponent then you are playing at a disadvantage. This could lead to an error over the board at some point in the game. Over the years I have found that emotions get in the way of the thinking process. I have played my best when my emotions are in check.
When I play my gambit openings I usually try for the big attack. I am willing to sacrifice my pawns or pieces for the attack on my opponents king. If you are down two pawns there really is no turning back. A gambit player may hold the endgame a pawn down but if you are down two pawns you will probably not hold the endgame to a draw. You really need to be thinking about winning the game in the opening or the middle game.
At a certain point in the game when you are losing, you need to not worry about losing. I was playing in a Table Tennis tournament and I was down in the third game by the score of 20 to 17 in a 2-games-out-of-3 match and was one point away from losing the match. We each had won one game and were now playing the third and deciding game of the match. I had realized I was now at the point of no return. My opponent needed only one point to win the match and I just said to myself that now I had nothing to lose and played the rest of the game without any fear of losing. I tied the score at 20 to 20 and went on to win that final game by 22 to 20 to win that match. This same mindset can also be applied to playing a chess game.
2. BE PREPARED
If you play a gambit chess opening you should have your lines well prepared before playing a tournament game. One of my Keoni-Hiva Gambit (1.e3 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.f4 exf4 4. Nf3) lines has been analyzed to a forced draw in the middlegame.
Each gambit opening has a set of tactics and also a set of strategy associated with that opening. You should be very familiar with the tactics and strategy that are associated with that particular gambit chess opening.
There are some very standard combinations that you should know. The only way to know this is to study a book on combinations or to study the chess games of Masters and Grandmasters.
I strongly recommend that you develop and maintain a computer chess database of games and analysis on your gambit chess opening. This is so that you can find and make improvements in your particular gambit chess opening. You can obtain a free IBM computer chess database software program called Chessbase Lite from the www.chessbase.com web site. With this program you can maintain your chess database of games & analysis in either pgn or chessbase cbh format. The Chessbase Lite program (and Frit8 Deluxe, Chessbase8 and Chessbase9) has a feature that allows the user to create an opening book from games in a chess database.
The chess web site known as “The Week In Chess” comes out with a weekly update of chess games and chess news from around the world. The web site: www.chesslab.com has a 2 million game chess database which is regularly updated. You could set up your gambit opening position and extract the games that you need. However, you will need to convert the text download into pgn format. The following link is to a web site which has links to other chess web sites with free chess databases of games. This is Lars Balzar’s web site. You could also purchase a CD or book which covers the particular gambit chess opening that you play.
If you do not have a computer then you could keep your gambit chess opening lines on index cards.
3. SURPRISE FACTOR
Your opponent may not be prepared to play against a gambit chess opening. There are three possible outcomes when your opponent is surprised by a gambit chess opening. In an unfamiliar gambit opening position your opponent could spend a lot of time analyzing each move and be down on time whether it is a tournament game or a blitz game.
At the Hawaii International/US Masters tournament in 1998, I had surprised my opponent Arianne Caoli, an up and coming junior player, with the White side of the Deimer-Duhm Gambit (1.d4 e6 2.c4 d5 3.e4). She was about 14 years old at that time but is now an International Master. She thought for 30 minutes on her third move. I used that extra time to do a deep think on a critical moment in the game.
http://www.chessville.com/UCO/CN/PsychologyofGambitChessOpenings.htm
Monday, June 14, 2010
Chess King's Mad Scramble
Lubomir Kavalek
The chess game had all the elements of football. But instead of a helmet, the quarterback had a crown on his head and was not guarded by 300-pound massive NFL linemen, but by tiny pawns. The pass-rushers were fast and heavy: the queen and two rooks flushed the quarterback out of the pocket and the scramble began. He could have been knocked down early, but escaped, running beautifully between and around the opponent's men deep into their territory. It was a mad rush, leading to a winning touchdown. When chess imitates life, it may even resemble American football.
The spectacular game was played between the Russian GM Alexander Riazantsev, who coached the former world champion Anatoly Karpov, and GM Sergey Karjakin, a former Ukrainian prodigy who settled in Moscow and now plays for Russia. It was so complicated even the chess computers sometimes hesitated to suggest the best way. How could have two human beings navigate their way through this mess? But they did brilliantly and with vigor.
It was the most dramatic clash at the tournament honoring Karpov in the Russian town of Poikovsky. It finished Sunday and the victory in this game helped Karjakin to share first place with Victor Bologan of Moldova. Both grandmasters scored 7-4, but Karjakin won the trophy on a better tiebreak.
Riazantsev - Karjakin
Queen's Indian defense
Poikovsky 2010
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 (The Queen's Indian, attempting to control the center with the Bishop from the square b7, was first worked out by Aron Nimzovich in the 1920s.) 4.g3 (Akiba Rubinstein's answer. White foresees the clash of the light Bishops on the long diagonal h1-a8.) 4...Ba6 (Nimzovich's aggressive idea, shifting the battlefield: Black puts pressure on the pawn on c4 and along the diagonal a6-f1.) 5.Qc2 (Previously considered meek, but the Queen move caught fire after it was connected with a gambit play. The original game Gruenfeld - Nimzovich, Breslau 1925, went 5.Qa4 c6 6.Bg2?! b5, expanding on the queenside.) 5...Bb7 6.Bg2 c5 7.d5!? (A modern pawn sacrifice, giving White some pressure against Black's entangled pieces. After 7.0-0 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bxg2 9.Kxg2 Bc5 the light Bishops disappear and Black equalizes.) 7...exd5 8.cxd5 Nxd5 9.0-0 Be7
10.Qe4!? (A powerful pinning move, threatening to attack the knight on d5 with 10.Rd1, for example 10...0-0 11.Rd1 Na6 12.Rxd5 Nb4 13.Nc3 Bf6 14.a3 with White's advantage. The previously played 10.Rd1 can be matched by a tactical development 10...Nc6! as Karjakin played against Leko this year in Wijk aan Zee. The point is that 11.Rxd5? loses to 11...Nb4.) 10...Na6 (Planning to fortify the knight on d5 with 11...Nc7. Preventing a calamity along the h1-a8 diagonal with 10...Bc6 runs into 11.Ne5. White gains a bishop pair and has a strong pressure along the d-file. The weaker 10...Qc7 is met by 11.Nh4! Bc6 12.Nf5 g6 13.Nc3! gxf5 14.Nxd5 with White's advantage as in Sakaev - Ekstroem, Budva 2009.) 11.Nh4 g6 (Hoping to prevent 12.Nf5.)
12.Nf5! (Chess magic! The knight sacrifice gives the white Queen space along the fifth rank. In the game Svidler-Karjakin, Sochi 2008, White was pushed back after12.Qe5 f6 13.Qe4 Qc8 14.Rd1 Nac7 and the piece sacrifice 15.Nxg6?! hxg6 16.Qxg6+ Kd8 did not quite work. Karjakin won in 37 moves.) 12...gxf5 13.Qe5 0-0 (After 13...f6 14.Qxf5 White wins the piece back with dividends, threatening a picturesque mate 15.Qh5+ Kf8 16.Bh6+ Kg8 17.Qxd5+! Bxd5 18.Bxd5 mate.) 14.Qxf5 (Threatening to clobber the black King with 15.Be4, White is not in any hurry to regain the piece. After 14.Bxd5 Bf6 15.Qxf5 Bxd5 16.Qxd5 Nb4 17.Qb3 d5 Black has a strong center.) 14...Re8 15.Nc3 Nac7 (The tactical defense 15...Nxc3 16.Qg4+ Bg5 17.bxc3 h5?! does not work. After 18.Qxh5 black is in trouble, for example: 18...Bxg2 19.Bxg5 Re5 20.f4 Rxg5 21.fxg5 Bxf1 22.g6! Qf6 23.Qh7+ Kf8 24.Rxf1 and White wins; or 18...Bxc1 19.Bxb7 Qg5 20.Qf3 Rad8 21.Raxc1 with White's clear advantage.) 16.Be4 (Looking to create chaos around the black King. After 16.Nxd5 Bxd5 17.Bxd5 Nxd5 18.Qxd5 Bf6 Black's pieces are suddenly active and well placed.) 16...Bf6 17.Qxh7+! (White has to continue chasing the black King since after 17.Nxd5 Bxd5 18.Bxd5 Nxd5 19.Qxd5 Rxe2 Black is fine.) 17...Kf8 18.Bxd5 Bxd5 (Forced, since 18...Nxd5? leads to a splendid king's hunt: 19.Bh6+ Ke7 20.Qe4+! Kd6 21.Bf4+! Be5 [21...Nxf4? 22.Nb5 mate] 22.Nb5+! Kc6 23.Rfd1! Kxb5 24.a4+ Ka5 [24...Kc6 25.Bxe5! wins] 25.Qc4! Bc6 26.Rxd5, threatening 27.Bd2+ or 27.b4 mate.) 19.Nxd5 Nxd5 20.e4 (The black Knight doesn't have many good squares.)
20...Nc7! (Aiming to protect the black King from the square e6. White gets a mating attack after 20...Nb4 21.Bh6+ Ke7 22.e5! Bxe5 23.Bg5+ Bf6 24.Qh6!, for example 24...Bxg5 25.Rfe1+ Be3 26.Rxe3 mate; or 24...Nd5 25.Rad1! Bxg5 26.Rfe1+ Be3 27.Rxe3+ Nxe3 28.Qd6 mate.) 21.Bh6+ Ke7 22.e5! (Opening the e-file makes the black king uncomfortable.) 22...Bxe5 23.Qe4! (The only way to continue the assault. After 23.Bg5+ Bf6 24.Rfe1+ Ne6 25.Rxe6+! dxe6 26.Bxf6+ Kxf6 27.Qh6+ Ke7 28.Qh4+ Kf8 forces White to take a perpetual check.)
23...f6 (After 23...Kf6? White accelerates the attack with a beautiful deflection 24.Bg5+!, for example 24...Kxg5 25.f4+ Kh6 26.fxe5 and now white should win either after 26...d5 27.Qg4 Rxe5 28.Rxf7 Qg5 29.Qh3+ Qh5 30.Qd7 Qg6 31.Qxc7; or after 26... Qe7 27.Rf5 Kg7 28.Qg4+ Kf8 29.Raf1 Qe6 30.Qh5 and the attack breaks through.) 24.f4 d5 (Building a protective pawn wall. After 24...Rh8 25.Bg7 d5 26.Qe2 Kf7 27.fxe5 Kxg7 28.Qg4+ Kf7 29.Rxf6+ win.) 25.Qh7+ Kd6 26.fxe5+ fxe5 27.Rf7 Ne6 ( A picturesque position!)
(Is the line of the pawns in front of the black King powerful enough to endure White's assault or is it going to be as porous as the offensive line of last year's Washington Redskins, breaking on the first hard push?) 28.Qg6 (28.Qf5 or 28.Raf1 can be met by 28...Re7.) 28...Kc6 (Attempting to exchange Rooks with 28...Re7 runs into 29.Bg5! Rxf7! 30.Bxd8 Rg7 31.Bc7+ Rxc7 32.Rf1 and White has the edge.) 29.Raf1 d4 (Planning to help the defense by centralizing the Queen on the square d5. Running away with the King 29...Kb5 invites a mating attack after 30.a4+!, for example 30...Ka6 31.b4! Nd4 32.b5+ Ka5 33.Qd3 c4 34.Ra1! cxd3 35.Bd2 mate; or 30...Kxa4 31.Qd3 c4 32.b3+! Kb5 33.bxc4+ dxc4 34.Rb1+ Kc5 35.Qa3+ Kd5 36.Qf3+ Kd6 37.Be3!, threatening 38.Rd1+.) 30.R1f6! (The pin is a big problem for Black. It freezes the knight.) 30...Qd5 (Protecting the Knight, but allowing a tactical punch. After 30...Kd5 31.b3 b5 32.Qh7 Qc8 33.Rd7+ Kc6 34.Rff7 White wins.)
31.Rxa7! (The Rook is tabu and the black King is now being rushed from both sides.) 31...Rad8 (After 31...Rxa7 32.Qxe8+ Kd6 33.Bf8+ wins.) 32.a4!? (White has the desire to control as many squares as possible around the black King, but it seems that 32.Bf8!, threatening to complete the siege of the knight with 33.Be7, was much stronger. After 32...Rxf8 33.Rxe6+ Rd6 34.Rae7! White should win, for example 34...Rxe6 35.Rxe6+ Kd7 36.Rxb6 d3 37.Qg7+ Rf7 38.Qxf7+ Qxf7 39.Rb7+ Ke6 40.Rxf7 Kxf7 41.Kf2; or 34...Rfd8 35.Rxd6+ [35...Qxd6 36.Re6!] Rxd6 36.Qe8+ Rd7 37.Qc8+. The powerful 32.Qf7 also leads to victory.) 32...c4 (Black could have made it more difficult with 32...d3 33.Qf7 Qd4+ 34.Kg2 Kd6. Imagine the despair on White's face after 35.Qc7+ Kd5 36.Qb7+ Kc4 37.Qxb6 Qd5+ 38.Rf3 [38.Kg1? is even worse: 38...Rb8 39.Qa6+ Kb3 40.Qa5 Nf4!! 41.Rb6+ Ka2 and Black wins.] 38...e4 39.Qb5+ Kd4 40.Be3+ Ke5, seeing that the black King in the middle is safe. And who would guess that the innocent-looking King move 35.Kh3! seals the win.)
33.Qf7? (Chess is a confusing game. Why the same move that worked wonderfully on the previous turn suddenly doesn't cut it? Because White could have woven a mating net with 33.Bf8!, controlling the dark squares and threatening - to confuse you even more - 34.Qf7! and 35.Qc7 mate. Black does not have a good defense, for example 33...Rxf8 34.Rxe6+ Rd6 35.Qh7! [Not 35.Qg7? Rf1+! 36.Kxf1 Qf3+ 37.Kg1 Qd1+ 38.Kf2 Qd2+ 39.Kf3 Qd1+ with perpetual check.] 35...Qxe6 36.Qb7+ Kc5 37.Ra5+! Kb4 [37...bxa5 38.Qb5 mate] 38.Rb5+ Kxa4 39.Qa6 mate.) 33...Kc5! (Running for life! The scramble begins) 34.Bd2 (It seems that 34.Rc7+! is the right way to go, for example 34...Nxc7? 35.Qxc7+ Kb4 36.Qxb6+ Kxa4 37.Qa6+ Kb3 38.Qa3+ Kc2 39.Rf2+ Kb1 40.Rf1+ Kc2 41.Rc1 mate, but and after 34...Kb4! White has to find 35.Re7! with winning chances.) 34...c3 35.Rc7+?! (The simple capture 35.bxc3! is much better, for example 35...dxc3 36.Bxc3 Kc4 37.Be1 Qe4 38.Rc7+ Kb3 39.Rc3+ Kb2 40.Rf2+ Kb1 41.Rb2+! Kxb2 42.Qf2+ and White mates.) 35...Kb4 (The luck is slowly turning in Black's favor.) 36.bxc3+ (White could have tried to bring the Queen back with 36.Rxe6!? Rxe6 [36...Qxe6 37.Qf1!] 37.bxc3+ dxc3 38.Bxc3+ Kxa4 39.Qf2 with chances to equalize.)
36...Kb3?! (Can the black King find a better hiding place after 36...dxc3! 37.Bxc3+ Ka3? The bishop sacrifice 38.Bb2+! may lead to a draw, for example 38...Kxb2 39.Rf2+ Ka3 40.Rc1! Qe4 41.Ra2+!! Kxa2 42.Qf2+ Kb3 43.Qxb6+ Ka2 [43...Ka3 44.Ra1 mate.] 44.Qf2+ Kb3 45.Qb6+ with a perpetual check.) 37.c4! (Better seems 37.Qg6 d3 38.Rcf7, but the shocking 38...Nf4! opens up the white King and Black wins.) 37...Qd6 38.Rb7 (Too slow. White should have tried 38.Rxe6!?, for example 38...Rxe6 39.Qf1! Kc2 40.Rf7!, forcing a perpetual check after 40...Kxd2 41.Rf2+ Kc3 42.Qc1+ Kb4 43.Qb2+ Kxc4 [43...Kxa4 44.Rf1! wins] 44.Qb5+ Kc3 45.Qb2+ etc.; or 38...Qxe6 39.Qf3+ and Black has to be careful since after 39...Kb2?! 40.Qd1 Qg6 41.Bc1+ ! Ka1 [or 41...Kb1 42.Rc6! Qxc6 43.Qd2 and 44.Qb2 mate] 42.Rf7! Qb1 43.Rf2 and White wins.) 38...d3 39.a5 Qd4+ 40.Kf1 Qe4 (Stepping in with 40...Kc2 is more precise, for example 41.Rxb6 Kxd2 42.Qb7 Rb8; or 41.Rf2 Qe4! 42.Bh6+ d2 and Black wins.) 41.Kg1 (After 41.Rxb6+ Kc2 42.Rbxe6 Black wins with 42...Qh1+ 43.Kf2 Qxh2+ 44.Kf1 Rg8! 45.Rf3 Rdf8 46.Qxf8 Rxf8 47.Rxf8 Qh3+, picking up the Rook on e6.) 41...Kc2! (The King turns into a powerful attacker and decides the game.)
42.Rxb6 (It is too late for 42.Re7 Rxe7 43.Qxe7 Kxd2 44.Rxe6 Qd4+ 45.Kg2 Kc2 46.Qh7 Kc3; or for 42.Rf2 Rf8! 43.Bb4+ d2 44.Bxf8 Rxf8 winning.) 42...Kxd2 43.Rbxe6 Rxe6 44.Qxe6 Kc2 45.c5 Qd5! (A simple winning solution, preventing the white Queen from going to a2. The d-pawn just rolls down.) 46.Qg4 (Black wins either after 46.Qf5 e4 47.Qf1 d2; or after 46.Qxd5 Rxd5 47.a6 Rd7 stopping the white pawns and promoting his own.) 46...Qd4+ 47.Rf2+ d2 48.Qf3 e4 49.Qf7 Kc3 (White can't stop the touchdown 50...d1Q.) White resigned.
The game would make a great addition to Colin Crouch's new book "Modern Chess: move by move," published by Everyman Chess http://www.everymanchess.com/ last year. It is a well-written collection of 33 brilliant games, played by some of the best grandmasters in the world. It is another of Crouch's gem - 400 pages of great analysis and wonderful text. Recommended for tournament players.
For replaying the game:
Note that in the replay windows below you can click on the notation to follow the game.
3rd prize Shakhmatnaya kompozitsia 1998
Reprinted with permission
Gherman Umnov
3rd prize Shakhmatnaya kompozitsia 1998
White: Kf7, Re7; pawns - e3, h7
Black: Kg2, Ra2, Bh8; pawns - a7, d5
l.Kg8 Bf6/i 2.Rf7/ii Be5 3.Rg7+ Kf3 4.h8Q Rh2 5.Rf7+ Ke4
6.Rf4+ Bxf4 7.Qd4+ Kf3 8.Qxf4+, winning the black Bishop and the 'game'.
i) 1...Ba1(Bc3) 2.Rg7+ Kh1 3.h8Q+ Rh2 4.Rg1+ and 5.QxB. Or
1...Kf3 2.Kxh8 Rg2 3.Re5 a5 4.Rxd5 a4 5.Ra5 Rg4 6.e4. So we
see why Black chooses f6 for his bishop. ii) 2.Rg7+? Kh1 3.h8Q+
Rh2 4.Rg1+ Kxg1 5.Qxf6 Rg2+, perpetual check.
"A chiselled study with light construction exhibiting
echo-sacrifices of the white Rook in both try and solution. If not on the grand
scale, nevertheless the taste is just right!"
Sunday, June 13, 2010
A RECIPROCAL ZUGZWANG PARADOX
Gherman Umnov, Podolsk
From EG No. 137 - (Vol.IX), July 2000
The outcome of any position of reciprocal zugzwang hangs on the turn to play. Most of the time study composers strive to carry this through by creating a try in which White, having the move, is in zugzwang, while in the actual solution the same position occurs but this time with Black having the move. Studies have been composed, and not a few of them, where the reciprocal zugzwang is dragged out for several moves, with Black every time lacking a neutral, in fact useful, move. Hm. Let's see if that is always so.
*****************************
U1 Gh. A. Umnov
Springaren, ix 1999
h6e6 0710.11 4/4 Draw
*****************************
U1: 1.Rxb7 Rh8+ 2.RH7 aRxh7+ 3.Bxh7, with:
- Kf7 4.h3! Kf6 5.h4 Kf7 6.h5 Kf6 stalemate, or
- Kf6 4.h4! Kf7 5.h5 Kf6 stalemate again.
In both lines in U1 we see after White's 4th a position of 'prolonged' reciprocal zugzwang.
Now put wP on a2 instead of h2, to create the schema U2, with Black to move.
*****************************
U2 (Gh. A. Umnov - matrix)
h6e6 0310.10 3/2 BTM, Draw
*****************************
U2: After 1...Kf7 we have 2.a4! Kf6 3.a5 Kf7 4.a6 Kf6 5.a7, and it's drawn, while after 1...Kf6 2.a3! and so on, also with a draw.
In U2 it is not so much wB that is paralysed as bR which is excluded from play, having no useful move. Obviously if Black had so much as a single neutral move of the rook without unpinning wB, then White would be winkled out of his draw.
But is this really so obvious?
*****************************
U3 Gh. A. Umnov first publication
h5f5 0310.10 3/2 Draw
*****************************
U3: White's choices are bare - he's under the cosh of mate on the move, and his bishop hangs. After either 1..Bc1 or 1.Bf8, Black will give check with his rook, pinning the bishop for ever. Then the white a-pawn will sooner or later become a sacrificial offering. However, in contrast to U2 all the pieces are one rank lower down the board, and this gives the rookm elbow-room for a temporising a move on top of bK's option to oscillate. So there's scarcely anything to choose between 1.Bc1 and 1.Bf8 - they are as bad as each other. Resign, then? Well, with nothing to lose, perhaps something will turn up. 1.Bc1? Rc7! Aha! Black is in no hurry with his check and bishop pin. He's playing cat and mouse, spinning out the agony.
2. Be3 Re7! Now there are two continuations for us to look at:
- 3.Bc1 Re1! 4.Bg5 Rg1! 5.Be7 (Bh4,Rg8;) Rg7! 6.Bf8 Rg8! 7.Bh6 Rg1! and Black wins, or
- 3.Bg5 Rg7! 4.Be3 (Bh6,Rg1;) Rg3! 5.Bf2 Rg2! 6.Be1 Rh2+! 7.Bh4 Rxa2 8.Bg3 Ra1 9.Kh6 Rh1+ 10.Kg7 Rg1, and again Black wins. [A pity that 4.Be3 Re7 transposes into the other line. AJR]
In this pair of try echo-variations Black forces wB to play to the g5 square so that it can be attacked to allow bR to cross the board's equator. But why should Black spurn the pin? Let's take a look at the other first move:
1.Bf8! with:
- Rh7+ 2.BK6 Rh8 (or Kf6;).
What now? 3.a3!! It's a paradox, but here's another position of reciprocal zugzwang: Rh7 (or Kf5;) 4.a4 Rh8 (or Kf6;) 5.a5 Rh7 (or Kf5;) 6.a6 Rh8 (or Kf6;) 7.a7, and this time the zugzwang can no longer be deferred, and it's decisive. Note 3.a4? Rh7 4.a5 Kf6 5.a6 Kf5 6.a7 Rxa7, and Black
wins.
- Rf7 2.Bh6 Rh7. What's this? It's Black's own king that's in the way of the rook's otherwise winning transfer to the southern hemisphere, whereas in the first line it's the white men that rule out the same manoeuvre. 3.a4! 3.a3? Kf6 4.a4 Kf5 5.a5 Kf6 6.a6 Kf5 7.a7 Rxa7 wins. Rh8 (Kf6) 4.a5 Rh7 (Kf5) 5.a6 Rh8 (Kf6) 6.a7, and it's the self-same zugzwang, with Black paying the drawing penalty.
The try 1.Bc1? loses for White because his pawn stays rooted to the subsequently vulnerable a2 square while Black threatens checkmate and harasses the white bishop. In the solution, on the other hand, White paradoxically draws precisely because his pawn is on a2, keeping the tempo-choice (of moving up one square or two) up his sleeve. Curiously, in the tries, whether Black allows the excelsior to run to completion or captures the pawn when it reaches a7 is largely irrelevant, but if he captures on the promotion square a fresh little study (U4) arises.
*****************************
U4 Gh. A. Umnov
first publication
e4h4 0130.01 2/3 Win
*****************************
U4: 1.Kf3! a2 2.Kf4. We have already met this position in U3, but with colours reversed. a1Q 3.Rxa1 Bg2 4.Ra5! Bf1/i 5.Rg5! Kh3 6.Rg3+ Kh2 (Kh4; Rg1) 7.Kf3 Bc4 8.Kf2
i) Bh1 5.Ra7 Kh3 6.Rh7+ Kg2 7.Rh8 Kg1 8.Kg3 and 9.Rf8.
It's a pity this study steps outside our theme, but U3 in contrast to U2 demonstrates once again that what is obvious is not always the whole truth. Which has to be the credo of every composer.
[See also EG135.11444.]
Saturday, June 12, 2010
32 gambetti nella Difesa Olandese
Per ogni gambetto viene inserita la valutazione di FIRE 1.31 (3400 ELO, profondità 20)
1.d4 f5 2.Cc3 d5 3.e4 (- 0.54)
1.d4 f5 2.Cc3 d5 3.g4 fg4 4.e4 (- 0.51)
1.d4 f5 2.Cc3 Cf6 3.e4 fe4 4.f3 (- 0.24)
1.d4 f5 2.Cc3 Cf6 3.g4 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.c4 e6 3.e4 (- 0.40)
1.d4 f5 2.c4 Cf6 3.Cc3 e5 (+ 0.80)
1.d4 f5 2.Dd3 d6 3.g4 (- 0.18)
1.d4 f5 2.Dd3 d5 3.g4 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.Dd3 e6 3.g4 (+ 0.14)
1.d4 f5 2.Dd3 g6 3.g4 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 d6 (+ 0.46)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 e6 (+ 0.97)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 e6 3.c4 (- 0.40)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 e6 3.Cf3 (- 0.56)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 fe4 3.Cc3 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 fe4 3.Cc3 Cf6 4.f3 (- 0.24)
1.d4 f5 2.e4 fe4 3.f3 Cf6 4.Cc3 (- 0.24)
1.d4 f5 2.Cf3 e6 3.e4 (- 0.56)
1.d4 f5 2.Cf3 e5 (+ 1.35)
1.d4 f5 2.Cf3 g6 3.h3 d6 4.g4 (+ 0.17)
1.d4 f5 2.g3 g6 3.h4 Cf6 4.h5 Ch5 5.Th5 gh5 6.e4 (+ 0.61)
1.d4 f5 2.g3 Cf6 3.h4 g6 4.h5 Ch5 5.Th5 gh5 6.e4 (+ 0.61)
1.d4 f5 2.g4 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.g4 d6 3.Dd3 (- 0.18)
1.d4 f5 2.g4 d5 3.Dd3 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.g4 e6 3.Dd3 (+ 0.14)
1.d4 f5 2.g4 e5 (no games) (+ 0.30)
1.d4 f5 2.g4 fg4 3.e4 d5 4.Cc3 (- 0.51)
1.d4 f5 2.g4 Cf6 3.Cc3 (+ 0.00)
1.d4 f5 2.h3 d6 3.Cf3 g6 4.g4 (+ 0.17)
1.d4 f5 2.h3 Cf6 3.g4 (- 0.10)
.
Friday, June 11, 2010
Zuzwang reciproco: Donna contro 2 Cavalli
[Nota bene: la frequenza dei finali D vs C+C è di 21 ogni 4.325.000 partite]
Nel caso del finale di Donna contro due cavalli, ci sono ben
229 casi di Zugzwang reciproco. Ne mostriamo due:
Il Bianco muove e patta; il Nero muove e perde.
Il Bianco muove e patta; il Nero muove e perde.
Ancora mutual Zugzwang: Donna contro 2 Alfieri
[Nota bene: la frequenza dei finali D vs A+A è di 7 ogni 4.325.000 partite]
Anche questo è l'unico caso di Zugzwang reciproco, come nel
precedente caso della Donna contro Alfiere e Cavallo
(ovviamente escludendo riflessioni e rotazioni,
altrimenti sono otto le posizioni).
Muove il B. e patta. Muove il N. e perde.
[FEN "8/8/8/8/5b1K/5b2/6k1/4Q3 w - -"]
1. Qa1 Bg3+ 2. Kg5 Kf2 3. Kf5 Kg2 4. Qc1 Bh2 5. Qa1 Bg3
6. Qc1 Bh2 7. Qa1 Bg3 *
[FEN "8/8/8/8/5b1K/5b2/6k1/4Q3 b - -"]
1... Bb8 2. Qd2+ Kf1 3. Qc1+ Ke2 4. Qb2+ Kd3 5. Qxb8 Bd5
6. Qf4 Kc3 7. Kg5 Kb3 8. Qd4 Bc4 9. Qc5 Bf1 10. Kf6 Bc4
11. Ke5 Kc3 12. Ke4 Kb3 13. Kd4 Bf1 14. Qc3+ Ka2 15. Qc2+
Ka3 16. Kc3 Bc4 17. Qb2+ Ka4 18. Qb4# *
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Una partita... dietetica: nessun pezzo mangiato
Nota bene: la patta venne richiesta da Filipowicz secondo la regola delle 50 mosse.
Filipowicz,A - Smederevac,P [C00]
Rubinstein mem 04th Polanica Zdroj (14), 1966
1.e4 e6 2.d3 Ne7 3.g3 c5 4.Bg2 Nbc6 5.Be3 b6 6.Ne2 d5 7.0-0 d4 8.Bc1 g6 9.Nd2 Bg7 10.f4 f5 11.a3 0-0 12.e5 a5 13.a4 Ba6 14.b3 Rb8 15.Nc4 Qc7 16.Kh1 Nd5 17.Bd2 Rfd8 18.Ng1 Bf8 19.Nf3 Be7 20.h4 h5 21.Qe2 Ncb4 22.Rfc1 Bb7 23.Kh2 Bc6 24.Na3 Ra8 25.Qe1 Rdb8 26.Qg1 Qb7 27.Qf1 Kg7 28.Qh1 Qd7 29.Ne1 Ra7 30.Nf3 Rba8 31.Ne1 Bd8 32.Nf3 Rb8 33.Ne1 Bc7 34.Nf3 Rh8 35.Ng5 Bd8 36.Nf3 Be7 37.Qg1 Bb7 38.Nb5 Raa8 39.Na3 Ba6 40.Qf1 Rab8 41.Nc4 Bd8 42.Qd1 Ne7 43.Nd6 Bc7 44.Qe2 Ng8 45.Ng5 Nh6 46.Bf3 Bd8 47.Nh3 Ng4+ 48.Kg1 Be7 49.Nc4 Nd5 50.Nf2 Bb7 51.Nh3 Bc6 52.Qg2 Rhc8 53.Re1 Rc7 54.Re2 Ra7 55.Ree1 Ra6 56.Re2 Rba8 57.Ree1 R8a7 58.Na3 Ra8 59.Nc4 Nh6 60.Na3 Nf7 61.Nf2 Rd8 62.Nc4 Rb8 63.Nh3 Bd8 64.Na3 Ra7 65.Qh1 Bc7 66.Qg2 Rd8 67.Qh1 Nh6 68.Ng5 Qe8 69.Kh2 Rd7 ½-½
Re, Alfiere e Cavallo contro pedone (promosso a Cavallo!)
Una posizione rara in cui il Nero, promuovendo a Cavallo, prende matto in 73 mosse dopo la promozione.
Il Bianco vince in 75 mosse.
FEN "8/8/8/2N5/2K5/8/1p6/1k3B2 w - -"
1. Bd3+ Ka2 2. Na4 b1=N (2... b1=Q 3. Nc3+ Ka1 4. Nxb1 Kb2
5. Nd2 Ka2 6. Nb3 Ka3 7. Kc3 Ka2 8. Bc2 Ka3 9. Bb1 Ka4
10. Nd4 Ka5 11. Be4 Ka4 12. Bd5 Ka3 13. Nb5+ Ka4 14. Kc4
Ka5 15. Kc5 Ka4 16. Bc4 Ka5 17. Bb3 Ka6 18. Nd6 Ka5
19. Nb7+ Ka6 20. Kc6 Ka7 21. Bc4 Ka8 22. Nd6 Ka7 23. Kc7
Ka8 24. Bb5 Ka7 25. Nc8+ Ka8 26. Bc6#) 3. Kb5 Ka1 4. Kb4
Ka2 5. Bc4+ Ka1 6. Bd5 Nd2 7. Kc3 Nb1+ 8. Kc2 Na3+ 9. Kb3
Nb5 10. Nc5 Nd4+ 11. Kc4 Nf5 12. Kc3 Nd6 13. Ne6 Ne8
14. Nd4 Nf6 15. Be6 Kb1 16. Ne2 Ne4+ 17. Kd4 Nd2 18. Kd3
Nf3 19. Bd5 Nh2 20. Kc3 Ng4 21. Kb3 Ka1 22. Be4 Nf6 23. Bf5
Ne8 24. Nd4 Ng7 25. Bg4 Ne8 26. Bh5 Nd6 27. Bg6 Nb5
28. Nc2+ Kb1 29. Kc4 Nc7 30. Nb4+ Kb2 31. Nd3+ Ka3 32. Nc5
Kb2 33. Bf5 Ne8 34. Ne4 Ng7 35. Bg4 Kc2 36. Nd6 Kb2 37. Kd5
Kc3 38. Nb5+ Kb3 39. Nc7 Kb4 40. Kd6 Kc4 41. Ke7 Kc5
42. Na8 Kd4 43. Kf8 Nf5 44. Bxf5 Ke5 45. Bc2 Kd4 46. Bh7
Kc4 47. Nc7 Kb3 48. Ne6 Kb2 49. Ke7 Kc3 50. Kd6 Kc4 51. Kc6
Kc3 52. Kc5 Kb3 53. Kd4 Kb2 54. Nc5 Ka2 55. Kc3 Ka1 56. Bc2
Ka2 57. Nb3 Ka3 58. Bb1 Ka4 59. Nd4 Ka5 60. Be4 Kb6 61. Ne6
Kb5 62. Kb3 Ka5 63. Bg6 Kb5 64. Be8+ Ka5 65. Ka3 Kb6
66. Ka4 Ka6 67. Bb5+ Kb6 68. Kb4 Ka7 69. Ka5 Kb7 70. Bd7
Ka7 71. Nc5 Kb8 72. Kb6 Ka8 73. Bh3 Kb8 74. Na6+ Ka8
75. Bg2# *
Re e pedone contro Re, Allfiere e Cavallo
(una posizione che richiede più di 50 mosse)
Il Bianco muove e vinnce
FEN "8/8/1P6/8/6b1/2k5/8/n1K5 w - -"
1. b7 Nb3+ 2. Kb1 Nd2+ 3. Ka1 Nb3+ 4. Ka2 Nd2 5. b8=Q Be6+
6. Ka1 Bc4 7. Qb6 Bb3 8. Qf6+ Kc2 9. Qb2+ Kd3 10. Qc1 Bc2
11. Qh1 Nc4 12. Qh8 Kd2 13. Qd4+ Bd3 14. Ka2 Kc2 15. Qg1
Be2 16. Qg3 Bf1 17. Qf2+ Nd2 18. Ka3 Kd3 19. Qg3+ Ke4
20. Qe1+ Kd3 21. Kb4 Be2 22. Kc5 Bf3 23. Qg1 Be4 24. Qf2
Nf3 25. Kd6 Nd2 26. Ke5 Nc4+ 27. Kf4 Bc6 28. Qg1 Kc3
29. Qc5 Bg2 30. Qg5 Bf1 31. Qg7+ Kd3 32. Qf6 Be2 33. Qd8+
Kc2 34. Ke4 Kb3 35. Kd4 Nb2 36. Qb8+ Kc2 37. Qh2 Kd2
38. Qf4+ Ke1 39. Qg3+ Kf1 40. Kc3 Nc4 41. Kc2 Nb6 42. Qf4+
Kg2 43. Qe3 Bg4 44. Qxb6 Bf5+ 45. Kc3 Kg3 46. Qe3+ Kg4
47. Kd4 Bc2 48. Qe2+ Kg5 49. Qxc2 Kf6 50. Qe4 Kf7 51. Qf5+
Ke8 52. Qh7 Kf8 53. Kd5 Ke8 54. Ke6 Kd8 55. Qd7# *
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Donna contro Alfiere e Cavallo: altri finali pari
[Nota bene: la frequenza dei finali D vs A+C è di 62 ogni 4.325.000 partite]

Il B. muove e patta.
FEN: 8/8/8/8/3k4/1Qn5/8/K1b5 w - - 0 1

Il B. muove e patta.
FEN: 8/2Q5/8/8/3k4/2n5/8/K1b5 w - - 0 1

Il B. muove e patta.
FEN: 1Q6/8/8/8/3k4/2n5/8/K1b5 b - - 0 1

Il B. muove e patta.
FEN: 8/8/Q7/8/3k4/2n5/8/K1b5 w - - 0 1
Quest'ultimo è anche un caso notevole di Zugzwang reciproco.
Se è il Nero a dover muovere, allora il Bianco vince.
Potrete controllare le mosse imputando le posizioni FEN qui:
http://www.k4it.de/index.php?topic=egtb&lang=en
Puntata precedente:
Due finali patti: Donna contro Alfiere e Cavallo
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Fire(Bird) 1.31 - Vs. - Deep Rybka 4 : 4-0 !!!
Differenziale ELO calcolato con BAYESIAN ELO RATING (da bayeselo.exe):
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Fire 1.31 w32 116 175 117 4 100% -116 0%
2 Deep Rybka 4 -116 117 175 4 0% 116 0%
[Event "5 Minutes/Game"]
[Site "Engine Match"]
[Date "2010.06.06"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Fire 1.31 w32"]
[Black "Deep Rybka 4 w32"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. e4 {book 0s} e5 {book 0s} 2. Nf3 {book 0s} Nc6 {book 0s}
3. Bb5 {book 0s} a6 {book 0s} 4. Ba4 {book 0s} Nf6 {book
0s} 5. O-O {book 0s} Be7 {book 0s} 6. Re1 {book 0s} b5
{book 0s} 7. Bb3 {book 0s} d6 {book 0s} 8. c3 {book 0s} O-O
{book 0s} 9. h3 {book 0s} Bb7 {book 0s} 10. d4 {book 0s}
Re8 {book 0s} 11. Nbd2 {book 0s} Bf8 {book 0s} 12. d5 {book
0s} Nb8 {book 0s} 13. Nf1 {book 0s} Nbd7 {book 0s} 14. Ng3
{book 0s} h6 {+0.15/11 17s} 15. Nf5 {+0.22/13 7s} Nc5
{+0.03/10 18s (Qc8)} 16. Bc2 {0.00/15 12s} Qd7 {+0.04/9 3s}
17. Nd2 {0.00/15 2s (N3h4)} c6 {-0.12/11 37s (g6)} 18. b4
{0.00/15 10s} Na4 {-0.18/8 0s} 19. Bxa4 {0.00/15 0s} bxa4
{-0.12/11 5s} 20. c4 {0.00/16 0s} cxd5 {-0.12/9 3s}
21. cxd5 {0.00/16 0s} Rec8 {0.00/9 7s (Nxd5)} 22. Qf3
{+0.29/15 7s} g6 {0.00/10 0s (Kh7)} 23. Ne3 {+0.51/14 5s}
Nh5 {0.00/9 1s (Kg7)} 24. Nec4 {+0.50/15 5s} Qb5 {+0.29/9
3s (Qd8)} 25. Na3 {+0.91/16 4s} Qe8 {+0.58/10 4s (Qb6)}
26. g4 {+1.21/16 5s (Ndc4)} Nf4 {+0.68/10 10s} 27. Ndc4
{+1.17/17 0s} Qd8 {+0.68/10 6s} 28. Bxf4 {+1.16/17 0s} exf4
{+0.68/10 2s} 29. Qxf4 {+1.22/17 0s} Be7 {+0.67/11 5s
(Rab8)} 30. Rad1 {+1.49/14 5s (Re3)} Rab8 {+0.67/8 21s
(Rc7)} 31. e5 {+1.84/13 4s} g5 {+1.20/8 0s} 32. Qf5
{+1.80/14 6s (Qe3)} Rc7 {+1.21/9 7s} 33. b5 {+2.08/14 0s
(e6)} Kg7 {+1.53/7 6s} 34. b6 {+2.23/15 0s} Rc5 {+1.58/9
2s} 35. e6 {+2.23/14 0s} Qg8 {+1.57/9 0s} 36. Rd4 {+2.31/13
0s (exf7)} Rf8 {+1.57/7 7s (a5)} 37. Qd3 {+2.18/14 5s} Kh8
{+1.52/8 0s} 38. Nc2 {+2.32/14 11s (Qd2)} Rb5 {+1.68/8 13s}
39. N2e3 {+2.47/14 0s (Qd1)} fxe6 {+1.72/7 4s} 40. dxe6
{+2.25/16 15s} Qxe6 {+1.63/9 0s} 41. Qd2 {+2.25/16 0s} Bf6
{+1.72/8 2s} 42. Nf5 {+2.25/15 0s} Qc8 {+2.12/7 3s}
43. Ncxd6 {+3.39/15 2s (Nfxd6)} Qc6 {+2.38/8 4s} 44. Nxb7
{+3.47/15 0s} Qxb7 {+2.38/8 2s} 45. Qd3 {+3.52/15 0s (Nd6)}
Qxb6 {+1.14/6 9s (Rxf5)} 46. Rd6 {+3.74/15 5s} Qc5 {+3.19/8
0s} 47. Rxf6 {+4.00/14 0s} Rxf6 {+3.26/10 3s} 48. Re8+
{+6.63/15 0s} Rf8 {+3.26/10 1s} 49. Qd7 {+11.24/13 0s
(Qd4+)} Rb7 {+8.45/7 5s (Qc1+)} 50. Qxb7 {+13.35/14 1s}
Qxf5 {+8.45/7 0s} 51. gxf5 {+13.43/17 0s} 1-0
[Event "5 Minutes/Game"]
[Site "Engine Match"]
[Date "2010.06.06"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Deep Rybka 4 w32"]
[Black "Fire 1.31 w32"]
[Result "0-1"]
1. e4 {book 0s} e5 {book 0s} 2. Nf3 {book 0s} Nc6 {book 0s}
3. Bb5 {book 0s} a6 {book 0s} 4. Ba4 {book 0s} Nf6 {book
0s} 5. O-O {book 0s} Be7 {book 0s} 6. Re1 {book 0s} b5
{book 0s} 7. Bb3 {book 0s} d6 {book 0s} 8. c3 {book 0s} O-O
{book 0s} 9. h3 {book 0s} Bb7 {book 0s} 10. d4 {book 0s}
Re8 {book 0s} 11. Nbd2 {book 0s} Bf8 {book 0s} 12. d5 {book
0s} Nb8 {book 0s} 13. Nf1 {book 0s} Nbd7 {book 0s} 14. Ng3
{book 0s} h6 {+0.06/15 11s} 15. Nf5 {+0.11/9 24s} Nc5
{-0.08/16 0s (Bc8)} 16. Bc2 {0.00/9 28s} a5 {0.00/18 0s
(Qd7)} 17. b4 {+0.23/9 11s} axb4 {-0.02/17 0s} 18. cxb4
{+0.23/11 9s} Na4 {0.00/17 0s} 19. Nh2 {+0.23/10 5s} Bc8
{0.00/16 1s} 20. Qf3 {+0.23/9 8s} Bxf5 {0.00/17 1s}
21. Qxf5 {+0.26/11 4s} Qc8 {0.00/18 0s} 22. Qxc8 {+0.26/10
4s} Rexc8 {0.00/17 0s} 23. Bd3 {+0.26/9 4s (Bd2)} Rcb8
{+0.08/18 8s} 24. Ng4 {+0.20/10 15s} Nxg4 {+0.22/19 15s}
25. hxg4 {+0.24/11 0s} Be7 {+0.22/18 0s (Ra6)} 26. Re2
{+0.50/11 6s} Bg5 {+0.17/20 0s} 27. Bxg5 {+0.49/12 6s} hxg5
{+0.17/22 2s} 28. Rc1 {+0.52/13 6s} Ra7 {+0.17/22 0s}
29. Rd2 {+0.59/13 3s (Rec2)} Kf8 {+0.16/19 12s} 30. Kf1
{+0.61/14 0s (f3)} Rbb7 {+0.16/20 10s (Ke7)} 31. f3
{+0.32/10 6s} Ke7 {+0.16/20 0s (Nb6)} 32. Ke2 {+0.65/11 20s
(Kf2)} Kd8 {+0.04/19 5s} 33. a3 {+0.42/12 0s} Nb6 {+0.04/18
0s} 34. Ra2 {+0.42/10 2s} Nd7 {+0.04/19 1s (Ke7)} 35. Rc3
{+0.44/14 10s (Kf2)} Ke7 {+0.12/21 44s (Ra4)} 36. Ra1
{+0.43/15 11s (Kf2)} Ra8 {+0.13/18 4s (Kf6)} 37. Rac1
{+0.44/13 4s (Rh1)} Kd8 {+0.12/17 1s} 38. Kf2 {+0.44/14 1s
(Kd2)} Ra4 {+0.04/19 3s (Nf6)} 39. Rh1 {+0.44/12 7s (Ra1)}
Nf8 {+0.04/17 0s (Ke7)} 40. Ra1 {+0.44/12 12s (Rb3)} Rba7
{+0.11/19 9s} 41. Rb3 {+0.43/13 0s} Rb7 {+0.11/19 0s}
42. Ke3 {+0.43/14 1s (Ke2)} Ke7 {+0.12/19 4s (Ng6)} 43. Rc3
{+0.44/13 4s} Kd8 {+0.12/19 0s (Nd7)} 44. Bc2 {+0.44/13 4s
(Kd2)} Ra8 {+0.12/19 4s} 45. Rh1 {+0.44/15 0s (g3)} Ra6
{+0.12/17 3s (Ke7)} 46. Kf2 {+0.44/11 2s (Kd2)} Rba7
{+0.04/17 2s} 47. Ra1 {+0.44/13 0s} Ng6 {+0.05/18 3s (Nd7)}
48. Ke3 {+0.44/11 2s} Rb6 {+0.08/18 0s (Ke7)} 49. Bd3
{+0.44/12 4s} Nf4 {+0.07/19 0s (Ke7)} 50. Bf1 {+0.44/13 2s
(g3)} Ng6 {+0.04/16 0s (Ke7)} 51. g3 {+0.44/13 2s (Kf2)}
Ne7 {0.00/16 0s (Ke7)} 52. Bd3 {+0.30/8 2s (Rac1)} c6
{-0.12/14 0s} 53. dxc6 {+0.22/9 0s} Nxc6 {-0.12/13 0s}
54. Bxb5 {+0.22/8 0s} Nxb4 {-0.33/15 2s} 55. Bc4 {+0.18/9
2s} Nc6 {-0.35/14 0s} 56. a4 {+0.18/9 0s (f4)} Rb2
{-0.21/15 3s (Nd4)} 57. Ra2 {+0.07/9 2s} Rxa2 {-0.22/18 0s}
58. Bxa2 {+0.06/10 1s} Nd4 {-0.22/18 0s} 59. Bd5 {0.00/11
0s} Rxa4 {-0.20/18 0s} 60. Bxf7 {0.00/13 0s} Ra1 {-0.22/19
2s} 61. Bc4 {0.00/14 0s} Ke7 {-0.21/18 0s (Rg1)} 62. Bd3
{0.00/14 5s} Kd7 {-0.21/20 0s (Re1+)} 63. Bc4 {0.00/11 1s
(Kf2)} Rb1 {-0.21/20 2s (Rg1)} 64. Bd3 {0.00/12 1s (Ba6)}
Rg1 {-0.13/19 3s (Re1+)} 65. Kf2 {0.00/15 1s} Rd1 {-0.13/20
1s (Ra1)} 66. Ra3 {0.00/12 1s} Kc6 {-0.13/18 0s} 67. Bc4
{0.00/11 0s (Ke3)} Rc1 {-0.13/17 2s (Rd2+)} 68. Bf1
{0.00/12 1s (Bd3)} Rc2+ {-0.20/19 2s} 69. Ke3 {0.00/12 0s}
Kb7 {-0.20/19 0s (Rh2)} 70. Ba6+ {0.00/11 0s} Kb8 {-0.20/19
0s (Kc6)} 71. Bf1 {0.00/12 1s} Rb2 {-0.20/19 0s (Kb7)}
72. Rc3 {0.00/13 1s} Kb7 {-0.20/18 0s (Nc2+)} 73. Bd3
{0.00/11 0s} Kb6 {-0.20/19 0s (Rg2)} 74. Rc8 {0.00/12 0s
(Bf1)} Rg2 {-0.10/19 3s} 75. Rb8+ {0.00/16 0s} Kc6
{-0.10/19 0s (Kc5)} 76. Rc8+ {0.00/14 0s} Kb7 {-0.10/19 0s
(Kb6)} 77. Rg8 {+0.01/12 0s} Rxg3 {-0.10/19 0s} 78. Rxg7+
{0.00/12 0s} Kc6 {-0.10/19 0s (Kb6)} 79. Rf7 {0.00/10 0s
(Be2)} Rg1 {-0.10/17 0s (Rh3)} 80. Rf8 {0.00/11 0s (Bc4)}
Ra1 {-0.22/18 2s (Kd7)} 81. Rc8+ {+0.13/7 0s (Bc4)} Kd7
{-0.35/18 1s} 82. Rc3 {-0.09/10 0s} Ke6 {-0.35/17 0s}
83. Kf2 {-0.06/9 0s (Bc4+)} Ra2+ {-0.35/18 2s (Kf6)}
84. Ke3 {-0.07/13 1s} Kf6 {-0.35/19 0s} 85. Bc4 {-0.07/12
0s} Rh2 {-0.35/18 0s (Ra1)} 86. Rc1 {-0.01/11 1s (Bf1)} Rh7
{-0.35/20 2s (Rh4)} 87. Bd3 {-0.07/13 1s (Bf1)} Ra7
{-0.35/19 2s} 88. Rc3 {-0.07/14 0s} Ra8 {-0.35/19 0s}
89. Be2 {-0.07/10 0s} Ra5 {-0.35/20 1s (Rh8)} 90. Bd3
{-0.07/12 0s (Bf1)} Ra7 {-0.35/19 0s (Ra1)} 91. Kf2
{-0.07/10 0s (Be2)} Ra8 {-0.35/18 0s (Kg6)} 92. Ke3
{-0.07/14 0s (Bf1)} Ra1 {-0.35/19 0s (Ra4)} 93. Kf2
{-0.07/14 0s (Bc4)} Ra2+ {-0.35/19 1s (Ra8)} 94. Ke3
{-0.07/13 0s} Ra5 {-0.33/18 0s} 95. Be2 {-0.07/13 0s (Kf2)}
Kg7 {-0.33/20 3s (Ra1)} 96. Rc7+ {0.00/10 0s (Bd3)} Kf8
{-0.33/19 1s} 97. Rc3 {-0.07/13 0s} Ke7 {-0.33/18 0s}
98. Rc7+ {-0.04/12 0s (Bd3)} Kd8 {-0.33/18 0s} 99. Rc3
{-0.04/12 0s} Ra7 {-0.33/18 0s (Ra1)} 100. Bf1 {-0.04/10 0s
(Bd3)} Ke7 {-0.33/21 2s} 101. Kf2 {-0.07/15 0s (Bd3)} Ra2+
{-0.33/19 1s} 102. Ke3 {-0.07/14 0s} Ra8 {-0.33/19 0s
(Ra1)} 103. Kf2 {-0.07/11 0s (Bd3)} Kf6 {-0.34/18 0s}
104. Bd3 {-0.07/14 0s} Rh8 {-0.34/19 1s (Ra1)} 105. Kg3
{-0.07/9 0s (Ra3)} Rb8 {-0.34/19 1s (Rf8)} 106. Kf2
{-0.06/9 0s (Ra3)} Rb2+ {-0.33/17 0s (Ne6)} 107. Ke3
{-0.04/10 0s} Rb7 {-0.32/19 1s (Rb4)} 108. Ra3 {-0.07/8 0s}
Rc7 {-0.32/20 2s (Rh7)} 109. Ra6 {0.00/8 0s} Ke7 {-0.32/19
0s (Ke6)} 110. Ra2 {-0.07/10 0s (Ra3)} Rc3 {-0.33/20 1s}
111. Ra7+ {-0.19/10 0s} Kf6 {-0.34/19 0s} 112. Ra2
{-0.33/10 0s (Ra6)} Rb3 {-0.34/17 1s (Ne6)} 113. Rh2
{-0.20/9 0s (Rd2)} Ne6 {-0.39/17 1s (Kg6)} 114. Rh6+
{-0.19/7 0s} Ke7 {-0.39/18 0s} 115. Kd2 {-0.33/9 0s (Rh7+)}
Nf4 {-0.40/18 1s} 116. Bc4 {-0.54/10 0s (Rh7+)} Rxf3
{-0.47/17 3s} 117. Rh7+ {-0.56/11 0s} Ke8 {-0.47/17 0s}
118. Rg7 {-0.51/10 1s} Nh3 {-0.48/16 0s} 119. Bd5 {-0.51/9
0s (Be6)} Rg3 {-0.58/14 0s} 120. Rg8+ {-0.51/9 0s} Ke7
{-0.48/16 0s} 121. Rg7+ {-0.51/9 0s} Kf6 {-0.48/17 1s
(Kd8)} 122. Rf7+ {-0.47/3 0s} Kg6 {book 2s} 123. Rd7
{-0.88/8 0s} Rxg4 {-0.48/15 0s} 124. Rxd6+ {-0.76/8 0s} Kh5
{-0.58/16 1s} 125. Re6 {-0.65/9 0s} Ng1 {-0.53/16 0s
(Rg2+)} 126. Ke3 {-0.17/254 0s} Kh4 {-0.47/16 2s (Rg3+)}
127. Rh6+ {-0.66/1 0s (Rxe5)} Kg3 {book 0s time} 0-1
[Event "5 Minutes/Game"]
[Site "Engine Match"]
[Date "2010.06.06"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Fire 1.31 w32"]
[Black "Deep Rybka 4 w32"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. e4 {book 0s} e5 {book 0s} 2. Nf3 {book 0s} Nf6 {book 0s}
3. Nxe5 {book 0s} d6 {book 0s} 4. Nf3 {book 0s} Nxe4 {book
0s} 5. d4 {book 0s} d5 {book 0s} 6. Bd3 {book 0s} Bd6 {book
0s} 7. O-O {book 0s} O-O {book 0s} 8. c4 {book 0s} c6 {book
0s} 9. Nc3 {book 0s} Nxc3 {book 0s} 10. bxc3 {book 0s} Bg4
{book 0s} 11. cxd5 {+0.56/14 7s} cxd5 {+0.45/11 31s}
12. Rb1 {+0.59/16 0s (h3)} Nd7 {book 0s (Qc7)} 13. h3 {book
0s} Bxf3 {+0.58/9 27s} 14. Qxf3 {+0.53/14 6s} Nb6 {+0.58/9
0s} 15. a4 {+0.53/14 0s (Re1)} Nxa4 {+0.50/10 12s} 16. Rxb7
{+0.44/15 0s} Nxc3 {+0.50/9 4s} 17. Bxh7+ {+0.35/14 0s}
Kxh7 {+0.50/9 5s} 18. Qxc3 {+0.35/15 0s} Qf6 {+0.47/10 12s}
19. Rb5 {+0.34/15 0s} Rfd8 {+0.37/9 4s} 20. Be3 {+0.30/15
3s (Qd3+)} Qf5 {+0.39/10 25s (Rab8)} 21. Qa1 {+0.31/15 11s}
Kg8 {+0.37/10 0s} 22. Ra5 {+0.24/15 12s} Rd7 {+0.38/10 0s
(Qd7)} 23. Ra6 {+0.38/15 12s (Qa2)} Qd3 {+0.45/10 42s
(Be7)} 24. Rd1 {+0.42/17 7s} Qf5 {+0.45/10 0s} 25. Re1
{+0.42/15 0s (Qa2)} Qd3 {+0.44/10 7s (Rb8)} 26. Qa4
{+0.36/14 5s (Qa2)} Rb8 {+0.35/9 8s} 27. Qxd7 {+0.32/15 0s
(Rc6)} Qxa6 {+0.35/11 12s} 28. Rc1 {+0.30/17 1s} Qb6
{+0.23/10 3s} 29. g3 {+0.38/18 0s} Rd8 {+0.11/9 5s} 30. Qc6
{+0.38/19 0s} Qxc6 {+0.42/10 4s} 31. Rxc6 {+0.38/18 0s} f6
{+0.45/11 1s (Bb4)} 32. Ra6 {+0.44/19 5s} Rd7 {+0.50/12 0s}
33. Bd2 {+0.42/18 0s (Kg2)} Kf7 {+0.46/12 3s (Be7)} 34. Kg2
{+0.41/18 10s (h4)} Be7 {+0.44/11 3s} 35. Kf3 {+0.37/17 0s}
Rb7 {+0.43/11 1s (Bd8)} 36. Ke2 {+0.42/16 1s (Kg4)} f5
{+0.52/10 6s (Kg6)} 37. Bf4 {+0.51/17 4s (h4)} g5 {+0.47/9
3s (Bf6)} 38. Bd2 {+0.35/16 3s} Bf6 {+0.47/12 0s} 39. Kd3
{+0.35/15 0s} Kg6 {+0.45/11 1s (Be7)} 40. Rd6 {+0.35/16 4s
(f4)} Rb3+ {+0.60/8 3s} 41. Bc3 {+0.35/16 0s} Rb5 {+0.65/10
1s} 42. Rd7 {+0.48/17 0s (f3)} a5 {+0.39/10 4s} 43. Ra7
{+0.50/18 0s} Bd8 {+0.39/9 1s} 44. Ra6+ {+0.51/18 4s (Ra8)}
Kg7 {+0.29/10 4s (Kf7)} 45. Ra8 {+0.54/19 4s} Bb6 {+0.28/11
0s} 46. Kc2 {+0.53/19 0s (h4)} Kg6 {+0.55/9 2s (Kf7)}
47. Rg8+ {+0.54/18 3s} Kh6 {+0.55/12 0s} 48. Rb8 {+0.54/19
9s (g4)} Kh5 {+0.55/11 4s (f4)} 49. g4+ {+0.62/19 4s (f3)}
fxg4 {+0.90/9 1s} 50. Rh8+ {+0.62/19 0s} Kg6 {+0.90/9 0s}
51. hxg4 {+0.62/19 0s} Ba7 {+0.90/11 1s (Bc7)} 52. Rg8+
{+0.61/19 4s (Rd8)} Kf6 {+0.99/12 6s} 53. Rf8+ {+0.60/20 0s
(Rc8)} Ke6 {+0.92/11 1s (Kg6)} 54. Rf5 {+0.70/16 2s (Re8+)}
Bb8 {+0.79/10 1s (Rb7)} 55. Rxg5 {+0.66/17 14s} Kf6
{+1.04/12 0s} 56. Rf5+ {+0.66/16 0s (Rh5)} Kg6 {+0.79/10
3s} 57. Rf8 {+0.71/17 0s (f4)} a4 {+0.79/9 1s} 58. Bb2
{+0.66/17 0s} Rb3 {+0.79/8 0s} 59. Bc1 {+0.83/16 3s} Bc7
{+0.98/9 0s (Rb6)} 60. Bd2 {+0.84/15 2s (f4)} Bb6 {+1.19/8
1s (Rb8)} 61. Ra8 {+1.91/15 4s (f4)} Bxd4 {+1.92/8 0s}
62. Rxa4 {+1.91/14 0s} Rb2+ {+1.92/7 0s} 63. Kc1 {+1.91/14
0s} Bg7 {+2.04/7 1s (Bh8)} 64. Ra6+ {+2.04/13 1s} Kh7
{+1.98/8 0s} 65. Ra5 {+2.04/13 0s (f4)} Rb6 {+2.39/8 1s
(Kg6)} 66. Rxd5 {+2.18/12 0s} Rc6+ {+2.60/8 0s (Rg6)}
67. Kd1 {+2.20/13 0s} Bc3 {+2.62/8 0s} 68. Be3 {+2.35/13 0s
(f4)} Kg6 {+2.72/6 0s (Bb2)} 69. f4 {+2.82/14 2s} Kf7
{+3.10/7 0s} 70. f5 {+2.85/13 0s (Ke2)} Kg7 {+3.32/7 0s
(Rc7)} 71. g5 {+3.21/17 6s} Rc7 {+3.39/11 2s} 72. Ke2
{+3.21/16 0s} Re7 {+3.69/10 0s} 73. Kf3 {+3.30/15 0s} Kf7
{+3.69/8 1s} 74. Rd1 {+3.30/15 0s (Kf4)} Be5 {+3.39/5 0s
(Rb7)} 75. g6+ {+3.68/14 2s (Bd4)} Kf6 {+3.88/7 0s (Kg7)}
76. Kg4 {+4.24/12 0s} Rb7 {+4.07/7 0s (Rc7)} 77. Bg5+
{+6.01/12 0s} Kg7 {+4.12/8 0s} 78. Kh5 {+6.13/14 0s (Bd8)}
Bf6 {+5.15/8 0s} 79. Bh6+ {+7.43/15 0s} Kg8 {+5.76/9 0s}
80. Rd6 {+8.10/15 0s} 1-0
[Event "5 Minutes/Game"]
[Site "Engine Match"]
[Date "2010.06.06"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Deep Rybka 4 w32"]
[Black "Fire 1.31 w32"]
[Result "0-1"]
1. e4 {book 0s} e5 {book 0s} 2. Nf3 {book 0s} Nf6 {book 0s}
3. Nxe5 {book 0s} d6 {book 0s} 4. Nf3 {book 0s} Nxe4 {book
0s} 5. d4 {book 0s} d5 {book 0s} 6. Bd3 {book 0s} Bd6 {book
0s} 7. O-O {book 0s} O-O {book 0s} 8. c4 {book 0s} c6 {book
0s} 9. Nc3 {book 0s} Nxc3 {book 0s} 10. bxc3 {book 0s} Bg4
{book 0s} 11. cxd5 {+0.71/10 23s} cxd5 {+0.52/14 7s}
12. Rb1 {+0.71/9 0s} b6 {+0.52/13 0s (Bc8)} 13. Rb5
{+0.52/9 17s (h3)} Nd7 {+0.37/14 5s} 14. h3 {+0.52/10 0s
(Rxd5)} Be6 {+0.32/11 0s} 15. Ng5 {+0.53/10 14s} Nf6
{+0.29/16 0s (g6)} 16. Nxe6 {+0.44/11 29s} fxe6 {+0.30/18
0s} 17. Re1 {+0.44/11 5s} Qd7 {+0.31/17 0s (Re8)} 18. Rb3
{+0.39/9 21s (Rb2)} Kh8 {+0.28/14 5s (Qf7)} 19. g3 {+0.50/8
11s (Bg5)} Qc7 {+0.21/15 7s (Qf7)} 20. f4 {+0.48/9 18s}
Rae8 {+0.25/15 0s (Rfe8)} 21. Bb5 {+0.47/10 22s (Bd2)} Re7
{0.00/15 6s} 22. Qf3 {+0.31/10 0s (Bd3)} g5 {-0.36/12 2s
(Kg8)} 23. fxg5 {-0.17/8 12s} Rg7 {-0.29/16 0s} 24. Rf1
{-0.17/7 7s} Rff7 {-0.28/16 0s} 25. Qg2 {-0.32/8 1s} Ne4
{-0.93/13 5s} 26. Bd3 {-0.48/7 0s (g4)} Rxf1+ {-1.71/15
11s} 27. Qxf1 {-0.59/9 0s} Rf7 {-1.71/15 0s} 28. Qe2
{-0.59/8 2s} Bxg3 {-1.76/14 0s} 29. Bxe4 {-1.48/7 5s} dxe4
{-1.92/14 0s} 30. Qg2 {-2.01/7 3s (Be3)} Bf2+ {-3.20/12 4s}
31. Kh1 {-2.41/8 0s} e3 {-3.20/12 0s} 32. Rb1 {-2.41/7 2s
(g6)} Kg7 {-3.41/10 0s} 33. Bxe3 {-3.90/7 3s (d5)} Bxe3
{-4.11/15 1s} 34. Rf1 {-3.87/7 0s} Qxc3 {-4.76/15 10s}
35. Rxf7+ {-4.04/8 1s} Kxf7 {-4.76/15 0s} 36. Qf3+
{-4.21/10 4s} Kg8 {-4.84/17 2s} 37. Qa8+ {-4.21/9 2s} Kg7
{-4.85/17 1s} 38. Qb7+ {-4.21/9 1s} Kg6 {-4.85/16 0s}
39. Qe4+ {-4.37/11 1s} Kxg5 {-4.85/16 0s} 40. Qe5+
{-4.37/11 1s} Kh4 {-4.93/17 0s} 41. Qe4+ {-4.37/12 1s} Kxh3
{-4.93/16 0s} 42. Qxe6+ {-4.37/12 1s} Kg3 {-5.01/16 0s}
43. Qg8+ {-4.37/11 1s} Kf2 {-5.13/16 0s (Kf4)} 44. Qg2+
{-4.84/8 6s} Ke1 {book 0s} 45. Qg3+ {-4.84/8 1s} Kd2
{-5.45/15 8s (Ke2)} 46. d5 {-5.26/8 4s (Qg2+)} Qc1+
{-6.15/14 5s (Qd3)} 47. Kh2 {-5.89/10 3s} Qf1 {-7.38/18 0s}
0-1
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Friday, June 4, 2010
E appena uscito - per Windows - Fire 1.3
Fire
| Fire - the world's strongest chess program. don't get burned ...try it yourself, it's free! |
| |
| downloads: Fire 1.31 is available Fire_131_w32_KLO (optimized windows 32-bit executable, logo, and readme files, compiled by KLO) Fire_131_w32_NS (optimized windows 32-bit executable, logo, and readme files, compiled by NS) Fire_131_w32_NS_no_SSE2 (optimized windows 32-bit executable, logo, and readme files, for older CPUs that don't support Intel SSE2 instruction set, compiled by NS) Fire_131_x64_KLO (optimized windows 64-bit executable, logo, and readme files, compiled by KLO) Fire_131_x64_KLO_popcnt (optimized windows 64-bit executable, logo, and readme files, for newer CPUs like Core i7, or any that support POPCNT, compiled by KLO) Fire_131_w32_KLO_popcnt (optimized windows 32-bit executable, logo, and readme files, for newer CPUs like Core i7, or any that support POPCNT, ideal if you run a 32-bit OS on a 64-bit system... compiled by KLO) if you experience an error message while trying to load one of these executables, you may need to download and run the Microsoft VC++ 2008 Redistributable Package: 32-bit 64-bit |
| |
| logos by Dave Dahlem: alternate logos: |
| Fire 1.31 (for Windows) by Kranium and Sentinel is UCI only, extremely strong, fast, and stable rating: ~ 3400 ELO features: bitboards true SMP parallel search configurable pawn hash analysis mode ponder searchmoves multiPV multiCentiPawnPV Hyatt Hash perft, benchmark, and drawboard utilites validate functions (debug) multi pos gain (for each CPU/core/thread) multi history (for each CPU/core/thread) major changes: 1.31 maintenance release with Fire 1.2 and 1.3, Totalbases and Triplebases can be configured to autoload on engine startup only via the fire.cfg file, so i've added 2 new UCI options, and associated code, which enables configuration of 'autoloading of Robbobases' via UCI GUIs: Autoload Totalbases Autoload Triplebases id name and id author are now placed outside of 'if (CfgFound)' statement in static void uci() this was causing Fire 1.3 to not load in Fritz and CB Hash size wasn't being read properly if using fire.cfg this has now been fixed 1.3 new/faster bitboard LSB/MSB routines mutually exclusive fire.cfg/UCI GUI options phase-scaled piece values improved QSearch fix/improvement MaxThreads = 256 several new/improved eval routines phase multiplier fix code cleanup speed improvement MultiPV now automatically disabled in 'game' mode several small bugfixes UCI options added: Lazy Eval 1 Lazy Eval 2 UCI_EngineAbout AspirationWindow Split At CN Split At EN ANSplitDepth ENSplitDepth PVSplitDepth Contempt Material Weight Positional Weight UseRobboBases Low Depth PVs Time Info Verbose UCI UCI_EngineAbout UCI options removed: NMR Smooth Scaling Extra Info no ELO improvement announcement here... but i'm quite sure that 1.3 is better than 1.2 in this regard... please test yourself to determine engine strength! 1.2 SMP improvements/changes major RobboTripleBase bug fix support for new RobboTriple/Total Blocked (Z) bases added improved hash functions UCI options added: UCI_AnalyseMode, CPU Load Info, Current Move, Depth Info, Hash Full Info, TB Hits Info, Time Info UCI options removed: Analysis Mode, Extra Info, Multi History, Multi Positional Gain NMR Smooth Scaling renamed NMR Scaling (Null Move Reduction Scaling) 1.1 support for RobboTripleBases and RobboTotalBases added reads Fire.cfg parameters file on startup writes (optional) time-stamped I/O log file NMR Smooth Scaling now 'off' by default 1.01 (maintenance release) bug fix: major changes to SMP (to prevent occasional exception error/timeout) changes to NMR Smooth Scaling Null Move verification default = true verification reduction default = 7 GetNumberOfConsoleInputEvents ->_kbhit 1.0 several minor bugs fixed: no longer occasionally displays score of 0.01 no longer drops a thread after ~16 hours in analysis mode engine now initializes at 128 Mb hash movelists enlarged to accommodate really long games pawn hash set to 32 Mb by default improved time management new UCI options: Get FEN Analysis (Fritz) Mode Move on Ponderhit (Never, Sometimes, Always) NMR Smooth Scaling (Null Move Reduction Smooth Scaling) Pawn Value Knight Value Bishop Value Rook Value Queen Value Bishop Pair Value Null Move Verification Verification Reduction Move on Ponderhit Extra Info UCI options removed: MultiCentiPawnPV RandomCount RandomBits Enhanced Time Management CPU Load implemented ETM has been improved and is now used by default new and improved SMP routines MultiPV now works in 'game' mode as well as 'Analysis' mode Fire is based on IppoLit engines by Yakov Petrovich Golyadkin, Igor Igorovich Igoronov, Roberto Pescatore, Yusuf Ralf Weisskopf, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar and all Decembrists for more info: http://ippolit.wikispaces.com this chess ship is a truly glorious achievement of the October Revolution and Decembrists movement! |
| |
| UCI options: Hash type spin min 1 max 65536 default 128 Pawn Hash type spin min 1 max 1024 default 32 Max Threads type spin min 1 max default 16 MultiPV type spin min 1 max 32 default 1 Pawn Value type spin min 0 max 200 default 100 Knight Value type spin min 0 max 650 default 325 Bishop Value type spin min 0 max 650 default 325 Rook Value type spin min 0 max 1000 default 500 Queen Value type spin min 0 max 1950 default 975 Bishop Pair Value type spin min 0 max 100 default 50 Null Move Reduction type spin min 0 max 16 default 8 Verification Reduction type spin min 0 max 16 default 7 Move on Ponderhit type combo var Never var Sometimes var Always default Sometimes UCI_AnalyseMode type check default false CPU Load Info type check default true Current Move Info type check default true Depth Info type check default true Hash Full Info type check default false TB Hits Info type check default true Time Info type check default true Ponder type check default false NMR Scaling type check default false Verify NullMove type check default true Get FEN type button Clear Hash type button default false TotalBase Cache type spin min 1 max 1024 default 4 TotalBase Path type string default TotalBase TripleBase Path type string default TripleBase Register TotalBases type button Verbose TotalBase Info type check default false AutoLoad TotalBases type check default false Load TripleBases type button Verbose TripleBase Info type check default false AutoLoad TripleBases type check default false |
| |
| About: my goal with Fire was to combine all the best ideas, features, and strengths from the IppoLit family of releases...IppoLit, RobboLito, Igorrit, and IvanHoe. in addition i have added all the best ideas that Sentinel and i came up with during the development of Robbolito 0.085g3. with enormous beta testing help from the Decembrists and Robbolito comrades, we posted more than a dozen public betas on Immortal223 during the last four months of 2009 (for details, please see the RobboLito page) |
Una variante dell'olandese, da Fire(Bird) 1.2
E la posizione è perfettamente pari (=).
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
1.d4 f5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bg5 e6 4.Nbd2 h6 5.Bxf6 Qxf6 6.e4 Nc6 7.c3 fxe4
8.Nxe4 Qf7 9.Bd3 d5 10.Ng3 Bd7 11.Qc2 O-O-O 12.Bg6 Qe7 13.O-O e5 14.
Nf5 Qe6 15.dxe5 Nxe5 16.Nxe5 Qxe5 17.Rfe1 Qf6 18.Nd4 Kb8 19.Bf5 c5
20.Bxd7 cxd4 21.Ba4 dxc3 22.Qxc3 Qxc3 23.bxc3 Bc5 *
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Welcome back, Kavalek !
Lubomir Kavalek
Chess Puzzles: The Art of Zugzwang
The action on the chessboard is in the moves and chess players are eager to make them. But sometimes they would rather stay put, skip a move, go for a walk and never come back. The dreaded word "zugzwang" crosses their mind and they know they are in trouble.
Zugzwang is a German word and, according to chess historians, it was introduced into English in 1904 by the world champion Emanuel Lasker.
What does it mean being in zugzwang? In simple terms, you have to move and you don't want to. Every move you make leads to a worse position and often to an outright disaster. You see it mostly in the endgame, sometimes in the middlegame and never in the opening. It flourishes in chess compositions - in chess problems and endgame studies.
We give three examples of the zugzwang theme. Try to solve them! We will publish the solutions on Monday, June 7.
The first example is a chess problem, in which White mates in two moves. It is attributed to Paul Morphy, an American genius who conquered the chess world in the late 1850s.
Paul Morphy
White mates in two moves
One clear rule of chess is that king against king, with no other pieces, is a draw. It is still a draw if you add two knights to one side. Or is it? The French poet, novelist and playwright, Alfred de Musset (1810-1857), played chess with passion, fantasy and temperament in the Cafe de la Regence in Paris. He became famous, but not as a chess player.
In 1849 he composed and published a wonderful chess problem that turned the theory about two knights upside down, as if to prove that almost every strategical and tactical rule in chess has its exception. The solution to his three-mover, based on zugzwang, is remarkable.
Alfred de Musset
White mates in three moves
The theme of dominating knights appeared in the work of the Latvian chess composer Johann Sehwers (1868-1940), also known as Janis Zevers. He was a prominent linguist and literary historian and his collection of 64 endgame studies, "Endspielstudien," was published in Germany in 1922. Try to find out how white wins in Sehwers's amusing study.
Johann Sehwers
White wins
To all those, who welcomed me back, many, many thanks! We plan to run the column twice a month. Chess puzzles will appear separately every two weeks.